Translate this page into:
Acute motor polyneuropathy as a rare neurological complication of mumps in a child: A case report
*Corresponding author: Shaziya Shahejan Nadaf, Department of Pediatrics, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubli, Karnataka, India. shaziya_nadaf@yahoo.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Nadaf SS, Shilpa C, Ratageri VH. Acute motor polyneuropathy as a rare neurological complication of mumps in a child: A case report. Karnataka Paediatr J. doi: 10.25259/KPJ_45_2026
Abstract
Mumps is a self-limiting viral illness, but its neurological complications, although uncommon, can be serious. We report a 6-year-old developmentally normal male who presented with abdominal pain and rapidly progressive weakness of both lower limbs 10 days after a febrile illness with bilateral parotid swelling. Examination revealed lower-limb and truncal weakness with diminished deep tendon reflexes and mute plantar response, suggesting a lower motor neuron pattern. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed mildly elevated protein with normal cell count, and nerve conduction studies demonstrated bilateral ulnar, common peroneal and posterior tibial polyneuropathy. Serum mumps-specific IgM antibody was positive, supporting the diagnosis of post-mumps acute motor polyneuropathy. The child improved gradually with intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and physiotherapy and achieved complete neurological recovery with full muscle power (5/5) in all limbs at 6-week follow-up. This case underscores the neurotropic potential of the mumps virus and supports the inclusion of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in national immunisation programmes.
Keywords
Acute motor polyneuropathy
MMR vaccine
Mumps
Mumps IgM
Paediatric
INTRODUCTION
A resurgence of mumps outbreaks has been observed in recent times, likely due to waning immunity and suboptimal vaccine coverage. Although mumps is generally a benign and self-limiting viral illness, it remains a notable cause of meningoencephalitis in children. Neurological complications, though rare, may include neuritis, myelitis, hydrocephalus and polyradiculopathy.[1] We present a rare case of acute motor polyneuropathy developing in a child during the course of mumps infection, highlighting the neurotropic potential of the mumps virus.
CASE REPORT
A 6-year-old developmentally normal male child was brought in with complaints of abdominal pain and progressive weakness of both lower limbs for 10 days. There was a significant history of febrile illness followed by bilateral parotid swelling 10 days before the onset of neurological symptoms.
On examination, the child was conscious, oriented, and haemodynamically stable. General physical examination was unremarkable. Neurological examination revealed lower-limb and truncal weakness with preserved upper-limb and neck-muscle strength [Figure 1]. Deep tendon reflexes were diminished in the lower limbs with a mute plantar response. Cranial nerves and the sensory system were intact, and bladder/bowel functions were normal. Features of meningitis were noted, including neck rigidity and positive Brudzinski and Kernig signs.

A provisional diagnosis of motor polyneuropathy/Guillain– Barré syndrome (GBS) was made. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed normal glucose (66 mg/dL) and mildly elevated protein (129 mg/dL) with a normal cell count. Computed tomography of the brain was suggestive of meningitis. Nerve conduction studies demonstrated bilateral ulnar, common peroneal and posterior tibial polyneuropathy [Tables 1 and 2, and Figure 2]. The diagnosis of mumps was supported by the characteristic clinical presentation of fever with bilateral parotid swelling followed by neurological manifestations and was confirmed serologically by detection of mumps-specific IgM antibodies in serum. Buccal swab reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) for mumps could not be performed as the child presented in the convalescent phase, after the acute phase of parotitis, and the facility was not available at our centre. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine was attempted but could not be completed as adequate sedation could not be achieved in the child; computed tomography (CT) brain (already obtained) was suggestive of meningitis and there were no clinical features of myelitis (no sphincter involvement, no sensory level, no upper-motor-neuron signs), so MRI was not pursued further after multidisciplinary review.
| Nerve | Minimum F-wave latency (ms) | Persistence (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Right median | 18.8 | 100 |
| Right ulnar | 19.3 | 70 |
| Left median | 19.4 | 70 |
| Left ulnar | 18.3 | 60 |
| Right common peroneal | Impersistent | — |
| Left common peroneal | Impersistent | — |
| Right posterior tibial | 33.0 | 80 |
| Left posterior tibial | 30.7 | 100 |
| Nerve (muscle) | Site | Latency (ms) | Amplitude (mV) | Distance (mm) | Lat. diff. (ms) | Velocity (m/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right median (APB) | Wrist | 2.04 | 6.0 | — | — | — |
| Elbow | 5.13 | 5.3 | 160 | 3.08 | 52 | |
| Left median (APB) | Wrist | 2.46 | 4.6 | — | — | — |
| Elbow | 4.75 | 5.0 | 160 | 2.29 | 70 | |
| Right ulnar (ADM) | Wrist | 2.15 | 1.4 | — | — | — |
| Below elbow | 4.06 | 1.5 | 165 | 1.92 | 86 | |
| Left ulnar (ADM) | Wrist | 1.88 | 1.0 | — | — | — |
| Below elbow | 3.69 | 1.2 | 155 | 1.81 | 86 | |
| Right common peroneal (EDB) | Ankle | 3.04 | 0.1 | — | — | — |
| Fibular head | Not obtained | — | — | — | — | |
| Left common peroneal (EDB) | Ankle | 3.35 | 0.1 | — | — | — |
| Fibular head | Not obtained | — | — | — | — | |
| Right posterior tibial (AH) | Ankle | 3.04 | 2.4 | — | — | — |
| Knee | 7.88 | 2.0 | 245 | 4.83 | 51 | |
| Left posterior tibial (AH) | Ankle | 2.94 | 2.6 | — | — | — |
| Knee | 7.65 | 2.2 | 245 | 4.71 | 52 |
NCS data table & waveforms. APB: Abductor pollicis brevis, ADM: Abductor digiti minimi, EDB: Extensor digitorum brevis, AH: Abductor hallucis, Lat Diff: Latency difference.

After multidisciplinary discussion, the patient was managed with intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy for 7 days and started on physiotherapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), which is the standard therapy for classical GBS, was not administered because the clinical picture was considered more consistent with post-infectious mumps-associated motor polyneuropathy with concurrent aseptic meningitis rather than classical GBS. The child remained haemodynamically stable throughout, with no respiratory compromise, no cranial nerve involvement, no autonomic instability and no rapidly progressive ascending weakness. The temporal relationship to confirmed mumps infection, the presence of meningitic features and the favourable initial response also supported an immune-mediated, steroid-responsive mechanism. Gradual clinical improvement was noted, with reduced neck rigidity and increased lower-limb activity. The child remained under close observation for any neurological deterioration.
At 6-week post-discharge follow-up, the child had made a complete neurological recovery [Figure 1]. Muscle power had returned to 5/5 in all limbs; deep tendon reflexes were normal; gait and functional mobility were age-appropriate and there were no residual motor, sensory, autonomic, sphincter or respiratory deficits. The child has remained well since, with no relapse or new neurological symptoms at the time of writing.
DISCUSSION
Mumps is a known neurotropic virus and is associated with a wide spectrum of central and peripheral nervous system complications. Meningitis is the most common neurological complication, occurring in 10–30% of symptomatic infections, while asymptomatic CSF pleocytosis may be found in up to 60% of cases.[2]
Polyneuropathy following mumps is exceedingly rare. The clinical picture in this case initially resembled GBS; however, the presence of recent mumps infection and positive mumps IgM supported a diagnosis of post-infectious mumps-associated polyneuropathy.[3]
The neuropathogenesis remains poorly understood and may involve immune-mediated demyelination or direct viral injury to peripheral nerves. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms of mumps-related peripheral neuropathy.
The choice of intravenous methylprednisolone over IVIG in this case was guided by the clinical phenotype. Although IVIG (or plasma exchange) is the established first-line therapy for classical GBS, our patient presented with a post-infectious motor polyneuropathy occurring in the context of mumps with associated meningitic features, without the rapidly progressive ascending paralysis, respiratory compromise, cranial-nerve involvement or autonomic dysfunction that would typically prompt IVIG. In such immune-mediated, para-infectious presentations with concurrent aseptic meningitis, corticosteroids have been used with favourable outcomes, as observed in our patient. The complete recovery at 6-week follow-up further supports the appropriateness of the treatment strategy adopted.
Limitations
Direct virological confirmation by buccal swab RT-PCR could not be obtained because the facility was unavailable and the child presented in the convalescent phase. MRI of the brain and spine could not be completed as adequate sedation could not be achieved; given the absence of clinical features of myelitis or focal neurological deficit and the early clinical improvement, MRI was not pursued further. The diagnosis nevertheless remains well supported by the characteristic clinico-temporal sequence, CSF profile, electrophysiological findings, positive serum mumps IgM and the typical clinical course with favourable recovery.
In India, the MMR vaccine is recommended by the Indian Academy of Pediatrics at 9 months and 15–18 months of age. However, it is not part of the National Immunisation Programme. Given the potential for severe neurological sequelae, universal inclusion of MMR in the national schedule is warranted to improve community immunity and prevent such complications.[4]
CONCLUSION
Post-mumps acute motor polyneuropathy is a rare but clinically significant complication of mumps infection in children. A high index of suspicion, supported by serological confirmation of mumps and electrophysiological studies, is essential for early diagnosis and management. This case reinforces the need for universal MMR vaccination and continued vigilance for neurological complications during the convalescent phase of mumps.
Acknowledgements:
The authors thank the clinical and laboratory staff for their support during patient care.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate parental consent forms. In the form, the parents have given consent for the patient’s images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The parents understand that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that they have used artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology solely for language refinement and to improve the clarity of writing. No AI assistance was employed in the generation of scientific content, data analysis or interpretation.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Mumps outbreak in a religious community: Clinical manifestations and the role of vaccine failure. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:265-72.
- [Google Scholar]

