Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Journal Review
Journal Summary
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Summary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Journal Review
Journal Summary
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Summary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Journal Review
Journal Summary
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Summary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
40 (
4
); 198-201
doi:
10.25259/KPJ_57_2025

Blood culture-proven neonatal sepsis and resistance trends in a tertiary NICU: A retrospective study

Department of Pediatrics, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute KMCRI, Hubli, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding author: Dr Keerthidarshini Khanappanavar, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute KMCRI, Hubli, Karnataka, India. keerthidarshini@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Kulkarni A, Ratageri VH, Khanappanavar K, Fattepur S. Blood culture-proven neonatal sepsis and resistance trends in a tertiary NICU: A retrospective study. Karnataka Paediatr J. 2025;40:198-201. doi: 10.25259/KPJ_57_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of mortality in India, with an increasing burden of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens complicating management. Unit-specific data on microbial profiles and resistance trends are crucial to guide empiric therapy and improve outcomes.

Material and Methods:

This retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubballi, from January to March 2025. All neonates with blood culture-positive sepsis admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during the study period were included (n = 73). Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were extracted from records. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns of carbapenems were compared with those of cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones. Outcomes were assessed in terms of survival or mortality.

Results:

Of 2,796 neonates delivered, 1,013 were admitted to the NICU, 542 were suspected of sepsis, and 73 (13.4%) had culture-proven infection. Most affected neonates were preterm (83.6%), and early-onset sepsis accounted for 57.5% of cases. Gram-negative organisms predominated (74%), with Klebsiella spp. (50.7%) and Acinetobacter spp. (23.3%) being most common. Carbapenems showed the highest efficacy (meropenem 96.4% and imipenem 96.2%), while cephalosporins (cephalosporins 96.2%), while cephalosporins (<3%) early-onset sepsis accounted for 57.5% of cases. Gram-n%, primarily among preterm infants and those infected with MDR organisms.

Conclusion:

Gram-negative pathogens, especially Klebsiella and Acinetobacter, dominate neonatal sepsis in this NICU. Carbapenems remain the most reliable therapeutic agents, though rising resistance underscores the urgent need for antimicrobial stewardship, rapid diagnostics and robust infection prevention measures to improve neonatal survival.

Keywords

Antimicrobial stewardship
Carbapenems
Gram-negative bacteria
Multidrug resistance
Neonatal sepsis

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal sepsis remains a major contributor to neonatal mortality in India, accounting for nearly one-fifth of all neonatal deaths. Its incidence is estimated between 2.7 and 17/1,000 live births in community-based studies and can be as high as 30/1,000 in hospital settings.[1-3] Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is typically associated with vertical transmission from the mother, whereas late-onset sepsis (LOS) is more often linked to nosocomial or community-acquired infections.

The growing burden of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) poses a significant challenge for effective management. Although empirical antibiotic therapy is routinely initiated in suspected cases, the inappropriate and frequent use of broad-spectrum agents has accelerated antimicrobial resistance.[4,5] Among the limited therapeutic options, carbapenems continue to demonstrate relatively high efficacy; however, increasing dependence on these agents may further drive resistance.[6,7] In this context, developing and adhering to unit-specific antibiograms is essential to guide rational empirical therapy, optimise clinical outcomes and curb resistance trends.

Research question

In neonates with blood culture–confirmed sepsis admitted to the NICU, does carbapenem-based therapy, compared with other antibiotic regimens, provide superior microbiological sensitivity and improved survival outcomes during a 3-month study period?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design and setting

This retrospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubballi, India, over 3 months from January to March 2025.

Study population

A total of 73 neonates admitted to the NICU with blood culture–confirmed sepsis during the study period were included.

Intervention

Antibiotic therapy was initiated based on blood culture and sensitivity reports, with carbapenems serving as the primary therapeutic option in most cases.

Comparison

Antibiotic susceptibility and resistance patterns of carbapenems were compared against other commonly used agents, including cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. Further comparisons were made between EOS and LOS, as well as between Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates.

Outcomes

  • Microbiological outcomes: Antibiotic sensitivity and resistance trends

  • Clinical outcomes: Survival versus mortality among neonates with culture-proven sepsis.

Study duration

Three months (January–March 2025).

Data collection and analysis

Relevant demographic and clinical data were retrieved from hospital records, including gestational age, sex, onset of sepsis, causative organism, antibiotic sensitivity profile and clinical outcome. MDR was defined as resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

During the 3-month study period, a total of 2,796 neonates were delivered, of whom 1,013 required admission to the NICU. Among these, 542 were clinically suspected of sepsis, and 73 (13.4%) were confirmed to have blood culture-positive sepsis [Figure 1].

Study flow chart. NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit
Figure 1:
Study flow chart. NICU: Neonatal intensive care unit

The majority of affected neonates were preterm (83.6%) and female (61.6%). EOS accounted for 57.5% of cases, while LOS was observed in 42.5% [Table 1].

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of neonates with culture-confirmed sepsis (n=73).
Characteristic Number %
Preterm 61 83.6
Term 12 16.4
Male 28 38.4
Female 45 61.6
Early-onset sepsis 42 57.5
Late-onset sepsis 31 42.5

Klebsiella species emerged as the predominant pathogen, isolated in over half of the cases (50.7%), followed by Acinetobacter (23.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (16.4%). Less common isolates included coagulase-negative staphylococci (5.5%) and Enterococcus species (4.1%) [Table 2].

Table 2: Microbiological spectrum of neonatal sepsis isolates.
Organism n %
Klebsiella spp. 37 50.7
Acinetobacter spp. 17 23.3
Staphylococcus aureus 12 16.4
Coagulase-negative staphylococci 4 5.5
Enterococcus spp. 3 4.1

Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that carbapenems remained highly effective, with meropenem and imipenem showing sensitivity rates of 96.4% and 96.2%, respectively. Among Gram-positive isolates, linezolid demonstrated the highest efficacy (94.7%). In contrast, aminoglycosides such as gentamicin showed only moderate sensitivity (50%), while amikacin (29.7%) and ciprofloxacin (44%) had poor activity. Cephalosporins performed worst, with sensitivity rates<3%, highlighting widespread resistance [Table 3].

Table 3: Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of sepsis isolates.
Antibiotic Sensitivity (%) Remarks
Meropenem 96.4 Highly effective
Imipenem 96.2 Highly effective
Linezolid (Gram +) 94.7 Most effective for Gram-positives
Gentamicin 50.0 Moderate activity
Amikacin 29.7 Limited efficacy
Ciprofloxacin 44.0 Low sensitivity
Cephalosporins ≤e Extremely poor efficacy

Clinical outcomes demonstrated that 59 neonates (80.8%) survived and were discharged, whereas 14 (19.2%) succumbed to sepsis, yielding a case fatality rate of nearly one in five among culture-proven cases.

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates that Gram-negative organisms were the predominant cause of culture-proven neonatal sepsis, accounting for nearly three-fourths of all isolates (74%). Klebsiella spp. (50.7%) and Acinetobacter spp. (23.3%) emerged as the leading pathogens. These findings are consistent with reports from NICUs across South Asia, where Gram-negative organisms – particularly Klebsiella and Acinetobacter – have been identified as the major contributors to neonatal sepsis and mortality.[1,2] Their predominance reflects both vertical transmission from colonised mothers and horizontal transmission within resource-constrained hospital environments.[3]

Carbapenems showed excellent efficacy in our study, with sensitivity rates exceeding 96% for both meropenem and imipenem. This reaffirms their role as the cornerstone of empiric and targeted therapy for neonatal sepsis in high-burden NICU settings.[4] However, the reliance on carbapenems raises concern, as inappropriate or prolonged use can accelerate the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), a phenomenon increasingly reported in low- and middle-income countries.[5,6] Conversely, the strikingly poor performance of cephalosporins (cephalosporins strikingly poor performance of cephalosporins-fluoroquinolones mirror global resistance patterns, highlighting the diminished utility of these once-standard agents.[7] For Gram-positive pathogens, linezolid maintained high sensitivity (94.7%), corroborating international observations that it remains a robust therapeutic option for MDR Gram-positive sepsis.[8]

The observed case fatality rate of 19.2% underscores the severity of neonatal sepsis and the persistent challenge of reducing mortality in this vulnerable population. Prematurity and infections due to MDR organisms were key contributors to adverse outcomes, in line with global evidence that immature immune responses, coupled with limited therapeutic options, significantly worsen prognosis.[9,10] The distribution of pathogens by timing of sepsis also merits attention: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) were more common in LOS, reflecting nosocomial acquisition,[11] whereas Enterococcus spp. in EOS likely indicates vertical transmission from maternal genital or gastrointestinal flora.[12]

These findings carry important clinical and public health implications. First, there is a pressing need to integrate rapid diagnostic tools, such as molecular assays or point-of-care culture techniques, to enable the timely initiation of targeted therapy.[13] Second, strengthening antimicrobial stewardship programs within NICUs is crucial to rationalise antibiotic use, prevent overreliance on carbapenems and slow the march toward pan-resistance.[14] Third, enhanced infection prevention and control strategies – including strict hand hygiene, aseptic delivery practices and judicious use of invasive devices – are essential, particularly for preterm neonates who face the highest risk.[15] Ultimately, the development of unit-specific antibiograms and periodic resistance surveillance can guide empiric therapy more effectively, thereby improving clinical outcomes.[16]

In conclusion, our study reinforces the shifting microbial landscape of neonatal sepsis toward Gram-negative dominance, highlights the precarious dependence on carbapenems and emphasises the urgent need for stewardship and preventive strategies. Addressing these challenges is vital for reducing the burden of sepsis-related mortality in neonatal populations, especially in resource-limited settings.

Strengths and limitations

This study provides real-time resistance data from a tertiary care NICU and exclusively includes culture-proven cases, minimising diagnostic bias. However, limitations include its retrospective design, small sample size and single-centre setting, which may affect generalizability. Despite these, the findings provide valuable baseline evidence to inform antimicrobial stewardship in similar NICU settings.

CONCLUSION

Neonatal sepsis in our setting was predominantly caused by Gram-negative organisms, with carbapenems remaining the most effective therapeutic option. High mortality was observed among preterm infants and those with MDR infections. These findings underscore the need for rapid diagnostics, antimicrobial stewardship and strengthened infection prevention strategies to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Ethical approval:

The Karnataka Medical College and Research Institute, Hubbali Ethics Committee has approved the research study, approval no: KMCRI:ETHICSCOMM:75:2025-26, approval date is 30th October 2025.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Pathogens associated with sepsis in newborns and young infants in developing countries. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(Suppl 1):S10-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India: A cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4:e752-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections in neonates: Burden of disease and challenges in treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017;30:281-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Neonatal sepsis: An international perspective. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F220-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Access to effective antimicrobials: A worldwide challenge. Lancet. 2016;387:168-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: The impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(Suppl 1):S28-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary care center in central India: Microbiological profile, antimicrobial sensitivity pattern and outcome. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2013;6:165-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Linezolid for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections in neonates: A systematic review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:372-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Neonatal sepsis. Lancet. 2017;390:1770-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: A systematic review. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:223-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Late-onset neonatal sepsis: Recent developments. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F257-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:21-47.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Biomarkers for neonatal sepsis: Recent developments. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18:493-500.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Health-care-associated infection in Africa: A systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:757-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. . WHO recommendations on newborn health: Guidelines approved by the WHO guidelines review committee. Geneva: WHO; . p. :10.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Antibiogram: A necessity in infectious disease practice. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013;31:93-6.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections