Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Journal Review
Journal Summary
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Summary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Journal Review
Journal Summary
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Summary
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Editorial
Journal Review
Journal Summary
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Review Article
Summary
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
40 (
3
); 102-108
doi:
10.25259/KPJ_22_2025

Role and need of pre-biotics and probiotics in the evolving gut microbiome

Department of Pediatrics, Bakul Parekh’s Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Gastroenterology, Apollo Children’s Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Corresponding author: Bakul Jayant Parekh, Department of Pediatrics, Bakul Parekh’s Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. drbakulparekh55@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Parekh BJ, Kesavelu D. Role and need of pre-biotics and probiotics in the evolving gut microbiome. Karnataka Paediatr J. 2025;40:102-8. doi: 10.25259/KPJ_22_2025

Abstract

The gut microbiota is pivotal in the development of various systems in the human body, and it has been understood that it plays a significant role in the formation and functioning of all these systems, including the gut–brain axis. The human gut microbiota is influenced by multiple factors, including amniotic fluid, mode of delivery, type of feeding, and the use of antibiotics in the first few months of life, with the list becoming endless as numerous factors contribute to its significance. This article aims to look at the pre- and post-biotics in the development of the human gut microbiome.

Keywords

Dysbiosis
Infant
Microbiome
Pre-biotics
Probiotics

INTRODUCTION

The gut microbiome is currently being extensively researched and recognised as playing a critical role in the management and prevention of diseases. Several bidirectional communication pathways, such as the gut-brain, gut-bone, gut-immunity, gut-lung and gut-skin axis, establish the gut as a central organ for metabolic, immunological and cognitive development and regulatory functions.

The foundation of a healthy gut microbiome is established in early infancy, making this period crucial for targeted interventions. The early colonisers of the microbiome are influenced by factors such as mode of delivery, choice of infant feeding, maternal antibiotic exposure, diet and multiple host-environmental interactions. Microbial balance determines overall health, while dysbiosis (microbial imbalance) is associated with conditions such as functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), allergies, asthma, metabolic syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and possible neurodevelopmental disorders. Thus, good gut health is essential for overall well-being.[1]

Pre-biotics and probiotics are effective in modulating the gut microbiome to support its optimal development and function. Pre-biotics act as a substrate for beneficial bacteria through fermentation, while probiotics restore microbial balance and enhance immunity. Together, they provide targeted strategies to improve gut health and prevent diseases in humans [Table 1].[2]

Table 1: Comparative profile of breast-fed versus formula-fed infants.
Microbiome / functional feature Breast-fed infants Formula-fed infants Clinical/physiologic implications
Dominant taxa Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, Lactobacillus spp.[12] Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridium sensu stricto, Streptococcus, Veillonella[12] Bifidobacteria generate acetate/lactate that lowers luminal pH and inhibits pathogens, whereas facultative anaerobes raise pH and increase endotoxin load
α-diversity (within-sample) Lower during the first 3–6 months, reflecting selective utilisation of HMOs[12,13] Higher, approaching adult-like heterogeneity[13] Early low diversity dominated by infant-type bifidobacteria is associated with reduced infection and allergy risk; premature diversification correlates with dysbiosis
Faecal pH and SCFA pattern Mean pH≈5.0–5.5; high acetate±lactate[14,15] Mean pH≈6.5–7.0; lower total SCFAs; relatively more branched-chain fatty acids[14] Acidic milieu hinders pathogens and improves mineral absorption; alkaline milieu favours opportunists and proteolytic fermentation
Immune markers Higher secretory IgA coating of microbes and T-reg priming[16,17] Lower SIgA, skewed Th2/Th17 responses[16] Better mucosal defence and oral tolerance in breast-fed infants; formula pattern linked to eczema and wheeze
Early clinical outcomes NEC, acute infections, over-weight/metabolic-syndrome risk, allergy[18-20] NEC, respiratory and GI infections, over-weight risk by 1 y, atopy[18,20] Differences are largely explained by microbiome-mediated immune and metabolic programming
Opportunities for microbiome modulation HMOs naturally act as selective pre-biotics Add GOS/FOS or 2'-FL, Bifidobacterium infantis or multistrain synbiotics[21,22] Targeted supplements can lower faecal pH, enrich bifidobacteria and cut NEC odds by ≥40%

NEC: Necrotising enterocolitis, SCFAs: Short-chain fatty acids, HMOs: Human milk oligosaccharides, FOS: Fructo-oligosaccharides, GOS: Galacto-oligosaccharides, GI: Gastrointestinal, SIgA: Secretory immunoglobulin A, IgA: Immunoglobulin A, T-reg: Regulatory T cells, FL: Fucosyllactose

FOUR PHASES OF GUT MICROBIOME DEVELOPMENT

The gut microbiome develops in a predictable sequence with distinct milestones:

Phase I – Birth

Colonisation begins at delivery. Vaginal births expose infants to beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which are essential for maintaining microbial diversity and supporting immune development. In contrast, caesarean delivery leads to reduced diversity and delayed colonisation of beneficial strains, increasing the risk of FGIDs and immune-related conditions such as allergies and asthma.[3]

Phase II – First 6 months

Feeding plays a crucial role in shaping the early microbiome, impacting immune and metabolic development. Breastmilk provides human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), which selectively support Bifidobacterium infantis, a bacterium that produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), lowers gut pH, and limits the growth of harmful bacteria. Formula-fed infants develop a more diverse microbiota with greater species variation, including facultative anaerobes. Breastfed infants typically have lower alpha diversity (fewer distinct species initially) but are enriched in beneficial strains, while formula-fed infants exhibit higher alpha diversity and greater inter-individual variation (beta diversity). In the absence of breast milk, it becomes increasingly important to choose the right formula, which includes probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics that can support eubiosis.[4]

Phase III – Introduction of complementary feeds

The introduction of solids exposes the gut to novel antigens, diversifying the microbiome. Increased environmental interactions (crawling, teething and mouthing) further modulate gut development, influencing the risk of FGIDs. Fibre-rich fruits and vegetables support SCFA-producing bacteria such as Bacteroides and Prevotella.[5]

Phase IV – Transition to family foods (12-36 months)

By age 2–3, with a full transition to a family diet, the microbiome further develops and stabilises into an adult-like composition [Figure 1].[6]

Phases of gut microbiome development.
Figure 1:
Phases of gut microbiome development.

ROLE OF PRE-BIOTICS

Pre-biotics are non-digestible carbohydrates that selectively promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, particularly Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Common prebiotics, such as fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and galactooligosaccharides (GOS), have been extensively studied for their role in modulating the gut microbiome. HMOs also function as bioactive pre-biotics.[7] Pre-biotics selectively promote the colonisation of beneficial bacteria. For example, GOS is seen to increase the colonisation of the probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri/Lactobacillus reuteri [Figure 2, Table 2].

Growth of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on mMRS (A) supplemented with 2% GOS (●); 2% rhamnose (▲); 2% mixture of GOS and rhamnose (♦); 2% maltodextrin (×); and unsupplemented (●). Results are expressed as means ± SD obtained from three independent replicates.
Figure 2:
Growth of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on mMRS (A) supplemented with 2% GOS (●); 2% rhamnose (▲); 2% mixture of GOS and rhamnose (♦); 2% maltodextrin (×); and unsupplemented (●). Results are expressed as means ± SD obtained from three independent replicates.
Table 2: Pre-biotics (scGOS/lcFOS, 2′-FL, HMOs).
Key study Design and intervention Microbiome effect Clinical signal
Wong et al. 2024[23] RCT, 200 term infants; 9 g/L scGOS: lcFOS (9:1) versus control formula×12 week Bifidobacterium spp. (×3.4), faecal pH (−0.9) 30% fewer parent-reported GI infections
Wiciński et al. 2020[24] RCT, 172 formula-fed infants; +1 g/L 2'-FL on GOS/FOS base Additional 21% rise in bifidobacterial abundance versus GOS/FOS alone Softer stools; no adverse growth effects
De Bruyn et al. 2024[25] Ex vivo faecal fermentation with 5-HMO blend±Bifidobacterium infantis Synergistic acetate+propionate (×2) Mechanistic support for HMO-guided synbiotics

RCT: Randomised-controlled trials, FOS: Fructo-oligosaccharides, GOS: Galacto-oligosaccharides, HMOs: Human milk oligosaccharides, GI: Gastrointestinal

Figure 2 demonstrates the ability of L. reuteri DSM 17938 to utilise the carbohydrates used in the human trial as growth substrates were tested in vitro. The results demonstrated that GOS supported the growth of the strain, highlighting its role in promoting the colonisation of L. reuteri. However, the strain was unable to ferment rhamnose (an indirect substrate) or maltodextrin (a placebo). Furthermore, when GOS was combined with rhamnose, it did not provide any additional growth advantage to the strain compared to GOS alone. These findings emphasise that GOS is a key factor in increasing the colonisation of L. reuteri.[8]

SCFA PRODUCTION AND BENEFITS

Mechanism

Gut bacteria ferment pre-biotics to produce SCFAs such as butyrate, acetate and propionate.[9]

Benefits

Gut health: SCFAs maintain intestinal barrier integrity by upregulating tight junction proteins, preventing leaky gut syndrome

Immune modulation: SCFAs induce the differentiation of regulatory T-cells, promoting immune tolerance and reducing inflammation

Metabolic regulation: Butyrate provides energy to colonocytes, while propionate influences lipid metabolism and appetite regulation [Figure 3].

SCFA production and benefits. SCFA: Short-chain fatty acids.
Figure 3:
SCFA production and benefits. SCFA: Short-chain fatty acids.

Infographics: Figure 3: SCFA production and benefits.

ROLE OF PROBIOTICS

‘Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer health benefits when consumed in adequate amounts’. They support microbiome balance by promoting beneficial bacteria, inhibiting pathogen adherence, enhancing mucosal immunity and restoring gut homeostasis after dysbiosis [Table 3].[10]

Table 3: Probiotics (L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus GG, multistrain mixes).
Key study Design Microbiome/immune outcome Clinical outcome
Fatheree et al. 2017[26] DB-RCT, 127 breast-fed colicky infants; L. reuteri DSM-17938 (108CFU/d)×28d Lactobacillus spp., butyrate producers Median crying time 50% versus placebo
Xiaohua L et al. 2025[27] Network Meta analysis with 2947 children with food allergy L. rhamnosus GG gave the greatest SCORAD reduction (−15 pts)
Dai et al. 2025[18] Meta-analysis, 31 RCTs in pre-terms Faecal bifidobacteria; dysbiosis index NEC risk RR 0.54; mortality RR 0.78
PEPS protocol[28] Ongoing Scandinavian RCT (>1,500 ELBW neonates) Will link strain-level shifts to NEC/LOS High-quality data expected 2027

PEPS: Probiotics in extreme prematurity in Scandinavia, ELBW: Extremely low birth weight, RR: Relative risk, LOS: Late onset sepsis, NEC: Necrotising enterocolitis, DB-RCT: Double-blind randomised controlled trial, DSM: Deutsche sammlung von mikroorganismen und zellkulturen,GG: Sherwood gorbach and barry goldin, SCORAD:Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis, ELBW: Extremely low birth weight L. reuteri:Limosilactobacillus reuteri/Lactobacillus reuteri, L. rhamnosus: Lactobacillus rhamnosus

APPLICATIONS OF SYNBIOTICS IN EARLY LIFE

The gut–brain axis illustrates the bidirectional communication between the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system, mediated by neural, hormonal and immunological pathways. The vagus nerve serves as a primary conduit, transmitting signals between the gut and brain. Gut microbes produce metabolites such as SCFAs and neurotransmitters, which influence brain function by affecting neurotransmitter production, inflammation and synaptic plasticity. Consequently, the gut microbiome profoundly impacts mood, behaviour and cognitive function, with dysbiosis linked to mental health disorders and neurodegenerative diseases [Table 4].[2]

Table 4: Synbiotics (combined pre+pro-biotics).
Key study Design Microbiome shift Clinical impact
Piloquet et al. 2024[29] DB-RCT, 321 infants; formula with 5-HMO blend+B. infantis LMG11588 and B. lactis Faecal pH 5.3 versus 6.2; bifidobacteria dominance within 2 weeks 42% fewer diarrhoea episodes
Sheng et al. 2025[30] RCT, 160 infants; organic formula+GOS/FOS+Limosilactobacillus reuteri/Lactobacillus reuteri and B. infantis SCFAs, secretory IgA Lower CRP and eczema incidence by 6 months
Chew et al. 2024[31] Toddler formula with scGOS/lcFOS+B. breve M-16V Restored Bacteroidota in C-section infants Better iron status (Hb+0.6 g/dL)

FOS: Fructo-oligosaccharides, GOS: Galacto-oligosaccharides, HMOs: Human milk oligosaccharides, Hb: Haemoglobin, DB-RCT: Double-blind randomised controlled trial, RCT: Randomised controlled trial, B. infantis: Bifidobacterium infantis, CRP: C-reactive protein, Hb: Haemoglobin, SCFAs: Short chain fatty acids

The gut-bone axis highlights the gut microbiome’s role in bone health. Gut bacteria influence bone growth and development through immune modulation and bioactive metabolite production. SCFAs, particularly butyrate, lower gut pH, thereby enhancing calcium and phosphorus absorption, which is essential for bone mineralisation. By modulating osteoblast and osteoclast activity, as well as affecting mineral absorption, the gut microbiome significantly influences bone matrix formation and overall bone health.[11]

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAEDIATRICIANS

Promote breastfeeding

Exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months fosters a healthy gut microbiome, supporting immunity, bone health, brain development and social growth.

Support gut health

Guide parents on making informed feeding choices to maintain microbial balance, support digestion, immunity, and neurodevelopment in the first 2–3 years of life. In the absence of breastfeeding, advise parents to choose the appropriate feeding option and avoid cow’s milk, as this would promote optimal digestion, immunity and neurodevelopment.

Strategies to prevent gut dysbiosis: Implement targeted approaches to reduce the risk of FGIDs and microbiome imbalances

Probiotics: L. reuteri for colic relief and gut microbiome modulation during the first 12 months of life to reduce the risk of FGIDs such as colic, diarrhoea and constipation. Saccharomyces boulardii for diarrhoea prevention

Pre-biotics: Recommend pre-biotic-enriched formulas for non-breastfed infants to support a beneficial microbial composition. For non-breastfed infants, suggest formulas containing pre-biotics along with the probiotics that help colonise. For example, GOS enhances the colonisation of L. reuteri, supporting a healthy microbial balance

Diet and lifestyle: Encourage practices that sustain microbial diversity and prevent dysbiosis-related health concerns.

Recent randomised-controlled trials (RCTs), network meta-analyses and mechanistic studies confirm that targeted pre-, pro-, syn- and post-biotics can steer the infant gut microbiome towards a breast-milk-like, bifidobacteria-rich state; raise SCFA output; tighten epithelial junctions and lower rates of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), infectious diarrhoea, regurgitation and even early eczema.

EMERGING RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Personalised microbiome interventions: Tailored use of probiotics, pre-biotics, synbiotics and post-biotics optimises gut health, immunity and metabolism, helping prevent gut dysbiosis, FGIDs and atopic conditions.[36]

Post-biotics and para-biotics: Stable, safer alternatives to probiotics with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory benefits, useful in NEC, colic, diarrhoea and allergies, especially for neonates and immunocompromised children [Table 5].[32]

Table 5: Post-biotics (heat-treated cells and metabolites).
Key evidence Description Main finding
Wegh et al. review 2019[32] Survey of 48 paediatric post-biotic studies Non-viable preparations modulate cytokines and enhance barrier proteins without sepsis risk
Lievin-Le Moal et al. 2007[33] RCT, 95 infants with non-rotavirus diarrhoea; lyophilised heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus LB Recovery shortened by 24 h versus live-culture control
Rattanaprasert et al. 2014[8] In vitro +human persistence study of Limosilactobacillus reuteri/Lactobacillus reuteri with GOS Heat-treated supernatant still inhibited pathogens and supported tight-junction gene expression.
Liu et al. 2023[34] Post-biotic derived from heat-treated Lactobacillus LB in adult volunteers Stool butyrate, claudin-1 mRNA, and no adverse events
Tonon et al. 2021[35] AR-formula with scGOS/lcFOS+post-biotic fermentate 35% greater reduction in regurgitation frequency versus the control formula

RCT: Randomised controlled trial, GOS: Galacto-oligosaccharides, LB: Lactobacillus, mRNA: messenger Ribo nucleic acid

Next-gen synbiotics: Strain-specific formulations combining probiotics, pre-biotics and post-biotics to enhance gut health, nutrient absorption and immunity, particularly in high-risk infants and children.[37]

CONCLUSION

Achieving and maintaining gut health is a key indicator of overall health, as the gut has become established as a central organ that influences various other bodily systems. Early gut microbiome development plays a crucial role in ensuring lifelong health. Pre-biotics fuel beneficial bacteria through the production of SCFAs, while probiotics help restore balance, supporting digestion, immunity and resilience against diseases.

Paediatricians should advocate for breastfeeding and educate families on gut-friendly diets. The key gut-related axes such as the gut-bone, gut-brain and gut-immunity axes emphasise the importance of early strategies to maintain eubiosis and promote long-term well-being. In cases where breastfeeding is not possible, paediatricians should guide families in selecting appropriate feeding options to support gut health.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Development of gut microbiota in the first 1000 days after birth and potential interventions. Nutrients. 2023;15:3647.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in health and disease. MedComm (2020). 2023;4:e420.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Microbial transmission, colonisation and succession: From pregnancy to infancy. Gut. 2023;72:772-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Gut microbiome and breast-feeding: Implications for early immune development. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;150:523-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . The role of diet and nutritional interventions for the infant gut microbiome. Nutrients. 2024;16:400.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . The intestinal microbiome in early life: Health and disease. Front Immunol. 2014;5:427.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Prebiotics: Definition, types, sources, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Foods. 2019;8:92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Quantitative evaluation of synbiotic strategies to improve persistence and metabolic activity of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Funct Foods. 2014;10:85-94.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Gut microbiota and short chain fatty acids: Implications in glucose homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:1105.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Probiotics: Mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1216674. Erratum in: Front Microbiol 2024;15:1378225
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Exploring the gut-bone axis: Impact of gut microbiota dysbiosis and dietary interventions on bone health. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2024;31:2595-604.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Comparison of gut microbiota in exclusively breast-fed and formula-fed babies: A study of 91 term infants. Sci Rep. 2020;10:15792.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:690-703.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Volatile fatty acids, lactic acid, and pH in the stools of breast-fed and bottle-fed infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992;15:248-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Elevated fecal pH indicates a profound change in the breastfed infant gut microbiome due to reduction of Bifidobacterium over the past century. mSphere. 2018;3:e00041-18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Fecal secretory immunoglobulin A in breast milk versus formula feeding in early infancy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1989;9:58-61.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Secretory IgA: Linking microbes, maternal health, and infant health through human milk. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30:650-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Effect of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25:237.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Effectiveness and risks of probiotics in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2025;155:e2024069102.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Association of exposure to formula in the hospital and subsequent infant feeding practices with gut microbiota and risk of overweight in the first year of life. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172:e181161.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Term infant formulas influencing gut microbiota: An overview. Nutrients. 2021;13:4200.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Infant formula with a specific blend of five human milk oligosaccharides drives the gut microbiota development and improves gut maturation markers: A randomized controlled trial. Front Nutr. 2022;9:920362.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Probiotics in the new era of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs): HMO utilization and beneficial effects of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis M-63 on Infant health. Microorganisms. 2024;12:1014.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . Human milk oligosaccharides: Health benefits, potential applications in infant formulas, and pharmacology. Nutrients. 2020;12:266.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Combining Bifidobacterium longum subsp. Infantis and human milk oligosaccharides synergistically increases short chain fatty acid production Ex vivo. Commun Biol. 2024;7:943.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Lactobacillus reuteri for infants with colic: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2017;191:170-8.e2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Lactobacillus GG and other probiotics in pediatric food allergy treatment: A network meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2025;12:1565436.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Probiotic supplementation and risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and mortality among extremely preterm infants-the probiotics in extreme prematurity in scandinavia (PEPS) trial: Study protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and registry-based randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2024;25:259.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of a synbiotic infant formula for the prevention of respiratory and gastrointestinal infections: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024;119:1259-69.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Synbiotic-supplemented organic formula enhances infant gut health: A randomized controlled trial. Funct Foods Health Dis. 2025;15:144-61.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. A young child formula supplemented with a synbiotic mixture of scGOS/lcFOS and Bifidobacterium breve M-16V improves the gut microbiota and iron status in healthy toddlers. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1193027.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Postbiotics and their potential applications in early life nutrition and beyond. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4673.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . An experimental study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the antisecretory activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB against nonrotavirus diarrhea. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e795-803.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. From probiotics to postbiotics: Concepts and applications. Anim Res One Health. 2023;1:92-114.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , . The effect of infant formulas with 4 or 8 g/L GOS/FOS on growth, gastrointestinal symptoms, and behavioral patterns: A prospective cohort study. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021;8:2333794X211044115.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Microbiome at the frontier of personalized medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:1855-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , . Pre-, pro-, syn-, and postbiotics in infant formulas: What are the immune benefits for infants? Nutrients. 2023;15:1231.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections